Re: solving equations
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg105970] Re: solving equations
- From: Maria Davis <arbiadr at gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:58:02 -0500 (EST)
- References: <hh1j05$965$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 25 d=E9c, 06:36, Bill Rowe <readn... at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On 12/24/09 at 8:58 PM, arbi... at gmail.com (Maria Davis) wrote: > > > But it is not wrong. Your very first equation states x is equal > to this value. In fact, you have several equations that do > nothing other than rename a variable. Why? Also all of the > equations are only simple additions and you have defined several > of the terms to be zero. > > What is it you want to do? Why needlessly enter what are > effectively redundant equations? Why introduce x in the first > place if what you want to do is solve for Csource.receiverRole.RT? > All your remarks are true, but, although these equations contains much redundancy and several terms are equal to zero, I must use them. In fact these equations are generated from a compiler and I have to use Mathematica in order to solve them either numerically or symbolically. Thank you for your help.