MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: solving equations

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg105970] Re: solving equations
  • From: Maria Davis <arbiadr at gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:58:02 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <hh1j05$965$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 25 d=E9c, 06:36, Bill Rowe <readn... at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On 12/24/09 at 8:58 PM, arbi... at gmail.com (Maria Davis) wrote:
>
>
> But it is not wrong. Your very first equation states x is equal
> to this value. In fact, you have several equations that do
> nothing other than rename a variable. Why? Also all of the
> equations are only simple additions and you have defined several
> of the terms to be zero.
>
> What is it you want to do? Why needlessly enter what are
> effectively redundant equations? Why introduce x in the first
> place if what you want to do is solve for Csource.receiverRole.RT?
>

All your remarks are true, but, although these equations contains much
redundancy and several terms are equal to zero,
I must use them.
In fact these equations are generated from a compiler and I have to
use Mathematica in order to solve them either numerically or
symbolically.
Thank you for your help.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Replace and ReplaceAll -- simple application
  • Next by Date: Re: reverse the order of replacements in a list of rules
  • Previous by thread: Re: solving equations
  • Next by thread: Export[..., ImageResolution, ... ImageSize]