MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

More /.{I->-1} craziness

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg106017] More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:15:25 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Stanford University

The more I play with these I->-I substitution rules, the more seemingly 
wildly inconsistent results emerge.  For example:  

   In[1]:= -I/.I->-I

   Out[1]= -I

   In[3]:= -E/.E->-E

   Out[3]= << The Esc e e Esc symbol >>

   In[4]:= -Pi/.Pi->-Pi

   Out[4]= \[Pi]

   In[5]:= -Infinity/.Infinity->-Infinity

   Out[5]= -\[Infinity]

(In/Out[2] is removed because it was an irrelevant cell.)


  • Prev by Date: Persistent assumption
  • Next by Date: Creating a plot of multiple graphs - multiple scaled axis...
  • Previous by thread: Re: Persistent assumption
  • Next by thread: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness