More /.{I->-1} craziness
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg106017] More /.{I->-1} craziness
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:15:25 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Stanford University
The more I play with these I->-I substitution rules, the more seemingly wildly inconsistent results emerge. For example: In[1]:= -I/.I->-I Out[1]= -I In[3]:= -E/.E->-E Out[3]= << The Esc e e Esc symbol >> In[4]:= -Pi/.Pi->-Pi Out[4]= \[Pi] In[5]:= -Infinity/.Infinity->-Infinity Out[5]= -\[Infinity] (In/Out[2] is removed because it was an irrelevant cell.)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
- From: Leonid Shifrin <lshifr@gmail.com>
- Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>
- Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
- From: Patrick Scheibe <pscheibe@trm.uni-leipzig.de>
- Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness