[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: two graphs have different color on surface
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg95695] Re: [mg95670] two graphs have different color on surface
*From*: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
*Date*: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:50:41 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <26857859.1232798005026.JavaMail.root@m02>
Steven,
I would suggest using ColorFunctionScaling -> False, and Rescale to control
precisely how the color function is working.
Here is plot statement that plots the Im part of the function, and also
color according to the Im part. The purpose of this to see if we are getting
precisely what we want.
ComplexColorPlot3[func_, {xmin_, xmax_}, {ymin_, ymax_},
opts___?OptionQ] :=
Module[{x, y},
Plot3D[Im[func[x + I y]], {x, xmin, xmax}, {y, ymin, ymax}, opts,
ColorFunctionScaling -> False,
ColorFunction -> (ColorData["Rainbow"][
Rescale[Im@func[#1 + I*#2], {-1, 1}]] &)]]
ComplexColorPlot3[Sqrt, {-1, 1}, {-1, 1},
ViewPoint -> {1.227, -1.942, 3.028},
Mesh -> None]
And there the coloring property tracks the height of the Im surface.
Then we change to a Re surface and an Im coloring.
ComplexColorPlot4[func_, {xmin_, xmax_}, {ymin_, ymax_},
opts___?OptionQ] :=
Module[{x, y},
Plot3D[Re[func[x + I y]], {x, xmin, xmax}, {y, ymin, ymax}, opts,
ColorFunctionScaling -> False,
ColorFunction -> (ColorData["Rainbow"][
Rescale[Im@func[#1 + I*#2], {-1, 1}]] &)]]
ComplexColorPlot4[Sqrt, {-1, 1}, {-1, 1},
ViewPoint -> {1.227, -1.942, 3.028},
Mesh -> None]
I think that is your plot. However, I don't especially like this because two
comparable things, the Re and Im parts of the function, are represented in
entirely different manners in the graphic. It might be better to do Re and
Im surface plots side by side. Or possibly a polar density plot of the
modulus with argument contour lines on top of it.
The Presentations package has technology for representing such multivalued
functions on a Riemann surface without any branch line discontinuities. The
function is single valued and continuous everywhere on the surface. The Sqrt
case is one example given in the documentation.
Needs["Presentations`Master`"]
DynamicModule[{zpt = {1.5, 0}, w, root},
Module[
{f = Function[z, Sqrt[z]],
sqrtz, z,
zcenter = 0},
sqrtz = Multivalues[Null, {Sqrt[z], -Sqrt[z]}, z];
Row[
{Draw2D[
{ComplexPolarDensityDraw[
Abs[f[z]], {z, ComplexPolar[0, -\[Pi]], ComplexPolar[3, \[Pi]],
zcenter},
ColorFunctionScaling -> False,
ColorFunction -> (ColorData["GrayYellowTones"][
Rescale[#, {0, Sqrt[3]}]] &),
Mesh -> {Sqrt /@ Range[.5, 3, .5]},
MeshFunctions -> (Abs[Sqrt[#1]] &),
PlotPoints -> {5, 10} 4,
MaxRecursion -> 0,
PlotRange -> {0, 3}],
Dynamic@
Arrow[{zpt,
zpt + 1/2 ToCoordinates[
root = Extract[
CalculateMultivalues[sqrtz][ToComplex[zpt]], {1, 1}]]}],
Locator[Dynamic[zpt],
Graphics[{CirclePoint[{0, 0}, 3, Black, Red]}]]},
Frame -> True, FrameLabel -> {Re, Im},
PlotRange -> 3,
PlotLabel -> Row[{f["z"], " as a Rieman Surface"}],
Background -> None,
ImageSize -> 350],
Dynamic@Column[
{ComplexArgumentPanel[ToComplex[zpt], {True, True, False},
Row[{"z", Spacer[20]}], {Left, Center},
ImageSize -> {185, 42}],
ComplexArgumentPanel[root, {True, True, False},
Row[{f["z"]}], {Left, Center}, ImageSize -> {185, 42}]}](*
Column *)},
Spacer[20]](* Row *)
]
]
This gives a polar density plot of the Modulus as a background. There is a
red CirclePoint locator that has an arrow attached to it. The arrow
represents the value of the complex function at the locator. The values of z
and Sqrt[z] are also dynamically displayed to the right of the graphic in
both Cartesian and polar form. Initially the arrow points to the right. If
you drag the locator around the origin once, the arrow will point to the
left. One has to circle the origin twice to get back to the original value.
One does not actually 'see' the Riemann surface, only its effects. One can
move anywhere around it, recapture both values of Sqrt[z] and get back to
the original point without any jumps, artifacts or discontinuities. Just
like Riemann said.
David Park
djmpark at comcast.net
http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/
From: Steven Siew [mailto:stevensiew2 at gmail.com]
I have tried to produce a graph where the color on the surface depends
on the value of z. When I tried doing it in two different ways, the
color are different on the two graphs even though as far as I can fee
they should be the same. The code are as below
ComplexColorPlot[func_, {xmin_, xmax_}, {ymin_, ymax_},
opts___?OptionQ] := Module[{x, y},
Plot3D[Re[func[x + I y]], {x, xmin, xmax}, {y, ymin, ymax}, opts,
ColorFunction -> (ColorData["Rainbow"][
Re@func[#1 + I*#2]] &) ] ]
ComplexColorPlot2[func_, {xmin_, xmax_}, {ymin_, ymax_},
opts___?OptionQ] := Module[{x, y},
Plot3D[Re[func[x + I y]], {x, xmin, xmax}, {y, ymin, ymax}, opts,
ColorFunction -> (ColorData["Rainbow"][#3] &) ] ]
ComplexColorPlot[Sqrt, {-1, 1}, {-1, 1},
ViewPoint -> {1.227, -1.942, 3.028}, PlotPoints -> {50, 50}]
ComplexColorPlot2[Sqrt, {-1, 1}, {-1, 1},
ViewPoint -> {1.227, -1.942, 3.028}, PlotPoints -> {50, 50}]
I expect the functions ComplexColorPlot2 and ComplexColorPlot to
produce identical color graphs when given identical inputs but they
dont. And I'm at loss as to why they dont.
My ultimate objective is to have the color reflect the value of Im[func
[x+I*y]] but I'm great difficulties in achieving it.
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: Re: Re: Which editor do you use for math**
Next by Date:
**Re: Timing of N[ Factorial[4000000], 18]**
Previous by thread:
**Re: two graphs have different color on surface**
Next by thread:
**hotkeys / inkey**
| |