Re: Invisible - misleading documentation
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg101902] Re: Invisible - misleading documentation
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:22:10 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <h41f8l$rlr$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Jul 20, 7:00 am, c... at gregosetroianos.mat.br wrote: > Chris, > > IMO, this behaviour is not surprising and the documentation is not > milsleading. After all, "invisible" is not the same as "inactive" or > "disabled". Besides, an invisible enabled button can be quite useful for > some purposes. Hmm. I cannot think of any purpose for which such a thing might be useful... Can you give an example? -- m