MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg100389] Re: [mg100342] Re: [mg100305] comments on Wolfram Alpha
  • From: Syd Geraghty <sydgeraghty at>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:46:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <>

Steven & Ingolf,

The policy probably has to evolve along with Wolfram Alpha.

As I see it there will be an API release soon that will inevitably tie  
Mathematica and Alpha tightly together.

Questions related to Mathematica interaction with Alpha would be valid  
topics for this forum in my opinion.

Syd Geraghty B.Sc, M.Sc.

sydgeraghty at

Mathematica 7.0.1 for Mac OS X x86 (64 - bit) (18th February 2009)
MacOS X V 10.5.6
MacBook Pro 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo  2GB RAM

On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:10 AM, Ingolf Dahl wrote:

I suggest a policy where letters about Wolfram Alpha from now on are  
let through only
in the cases where Mathematica as such also really is involved. Other
letters fit better as direct feedback to Wolfram or as letters to the
WolframAlpha Community. What is the opinion of the Moderator here?

[I am open to comments on this issue - what rules should
apply? -- Moderator]



  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: String as a variable name
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha
  • Previous by thread: Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha