Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg100405] Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha
  • From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:49:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Stanford University
  • References: <200905311037.GAA17018@smc.vnet.net> <h00cuf$pf6$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <h00cuf$pf6$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
 "Ingolf Dahl" <ingolf.dahl at telia.com> wrote:

> letters fit better as direct feedback to Wolfram or as letters to the
> WolframAlpha Community. What is the opinion of the Moderator here?
> 
> [I am open to comments on this issue - what rules should
> apply? -- Moderator]
> 

No strong opinion on the question of splitting Mathematica and Alpha 
into separate forums (can see arguments either way) ---but as someone 
who finds newsgroups immensely better than email lists for this (or any 
similar) type of public discussion, I hope that whatever you do will end 
up with all such forums existing as (or mirrored to) plain old Usenet 
newsgroups.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Min function returns Min[2.05875,] instead of just 2.05875
  • Next by Date: Re: Min function returns Min[2.05875,] instead of just 2.05875
  • Previous by thread: Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha