Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg100401] Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha
- From: congruentialuminaire at yahoo.com
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:48:40 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Just give this string to both "engines" and you will see what we mean:
"stopping power air, 0.731MeV electron". Then change the same query
to .371 MeV and re-submit to both.
The intersection of the greatest part of their domain and range is
On May 31, 3:36 am, Beliavsky <beliav... at aol.com> wrote:
> input: arima
> output: Arima,Trinidad and Tobago
> city population | 34997 people
> my comment: Nothing about ARIMA time series models, which comes up as
> the 3rd link on Google.
> input: garch
> output: Wolfram|Alpha isn't sure what to do with your input.
> * Did you mean:march
> my comment: nothing about GARCH time series models, widely used in
> input: united states budget deficit
> output: -$347 billion per year (US dollars per year) (2005 estimate)
> my comment: Users would want more recent data, such as the 2008
> deficit and the estimated 2009 deficit.
> Wolfram Alpha appears much less useful than the combination of Google
> and Mathematica, so I wonder if resources are better spent adding
> functionality to Mathematica.
Prev by Date:
Re: MatrixForm affects values instead of only printing
Next by Date:
slightly malfunctioning Help
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: comments on Wolfram Alpha
Next by thread:
Re: problem writing debugging utility function