Re: Re: Re: Combined Set, SetDelayed
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg100880] Re: [mg100836] Re: [mg100829] Re: Combined Set, SetDelayed
- From: Louis Talman <talmanl at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:36:48 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <h0vteh$6v2$1@smc.vnet.net> <h12gck$e8s$1@smc.vnet.net> <200906170148.VAA25561@smc.vnet.net>
How about "impossibly quick"? in 2E-15 seconds, light travels just 0.0006 millimeters. Not even close to the width of the chip... On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:48 PM, peter wrote: > seems amazingly quick - 10^-15 seconds.....? > > 2009/6/15 Helen Read <hpr at together.net>: >> AES wrote: >>> Helen Read <hpr at together.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> 0.811 seconds. The second version, using the function that >>>> remembers >>>> values, took only 1.87003*10^-15 seconds. >>> >>> The frequency of visible light is around 3*10^14 Hz, so that's >>> around >>> one period of a visible light wave. Is there maybe a typo here? >> >> No, no typo. Not sure what your point is. >> >> -- >> Helen Read >> University of Vermont >> >> > > > > -- > Peter Lindsay --Lou Talman Department of Mathematical & Computer Sciences Metropolitan State College of Denver <http://clem.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>
- References:
- Re: Re: Combined Set, SetDelayed
- From: peter <plindsay.0@gmail.com>
- Re: Re: Combined Set, SetDelayed