Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Re: Combined Set, SetDelayed

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg100892] Re: [mg100836] Re: [mg100829] Re: Combined Set, SetDelayed
  • From: peter <plindsay.0 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:45:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <h0vteh$6v2$1@smc.vnet.net> <h12gck$e8s$1@smc.vnet.net>

yes, even on my iMac that seems unfeasible.
P

2009/6/17 Louis Talman <talmanl at gmail.com>:
> How about "impossibly quick"?  in 2E-15 seconds, light travels just 0.0=
006
> millimeters.  Not even close to the width of the chip...
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:48 PM, peter wrote:
>
> seems amazingly quick - 10^-15 seconds.....?
>
> 2009/6/15 Helen Read <hpr at together.net>:
>
> AES wrote:
>
> Helen Read <hpr at together.net>
>
> wrote:
>
> 0.811 seconds. The second version, using the function that remembers
>
> values, took only 1.87003*10^-15 seconds.
>
> The frequency of visible light is around 3*10^14 Hz, so that's around
>
> one period of a visible light wave.  Is there maybe a typo here?
>
> No, no typo. Not sure what your point is.
>
> --
>
> Helen Read
>
> University of Vermont
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Lindsay
>
> --Lou Talman
>   Department of Mathematical & Computer Sciences
>   Metropolitan State College of Denver
>   <http://clem.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>
>



--
Peter Lindsay


  • Prev by Date: Re: How to downsample a image matrix using left and right
  • Next by Date: Re: Hilbert transform bug in 7.0.3?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Combined Set, SetDelayed
  • Next by thread: need a help