Re: wrong solution for double integral of piecewise function?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg96987] Re: wrong solution for double integral of piecewise function?
• From: Tom Roche <tlroche at gmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 04:55:37 -0500 (EST)
• References: <gob80u\$g9q\$1@smc.vnet.net>

```Tom Roche Feb 28, 6:43 am
>> Solve[
>>   First[
>>     Integrate[
>>       Integrate[
>>         f[\[Chi], \[Psi]], {\[Psi], -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}
>>       ],
>>         {\[Chi], -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}
>>     ]
>>   ] == 1, k
>> ]

>> [gets]

>> (2) {{k -> -(1/((a - b)^2 (-1 + UnitStep[a - b])))}}

Bob Hanlon
> When you integrated by hand you assumed that b > a, Mathematica
> gives a more complicated result since it does not make that
> assumption unless you tell it to do so.

and he points out that the proper way to do this is by wrapping an
Assuming around the procedure above:

Assuming[{b > a},
Solve[
First[
Integrate[
Integrate[
f[\[Chi], \[Psi]], {\[Psi], -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}
],
{\[Chi], -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}
]
] == 1, k
]
]

produces

{{k -> 1/(a - b)^2}}

Thanks!

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: How to Export the "Manipulate"
• Next by Date: Re: contourlabels in contour plot
• Previous by thread: Re: Do Hershey Vector Fonts exist in Mathematica?
• Next by thread: Re: wrong solution for double integral of piecewise function?