Re: Mathematica 7.0.1.0 and some General Comments
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg97321] Re: Mathematica 7.0.1.0 and some General Comments
- From: mike.honeychurch at gmail.com
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:20:48 -0500 (EST)
- References: <goqphr$lt2$1@smc.vnet.net> <200903070737.CAA16863@smc.vnet.net>
On Mar 10, 5:32 am, Peltio <pel... at twilight.zone> wrote: > Ingolf Dahl wrote: > > Some of these alternatives can only be considered to be free as long as= you > > count your own time as free. > > Free as in 'free beer', but also as in 'free speech'. As more functions > get moved into the kernel, customization becomes hard if not > unfeasible. > > > To reinvent the wheel must always be considered > > as unprofessional malpractice. > > Agreed. But when the student leaves school can he still afford the pro > tool? Is the company he is applying for a job willing to buy it because > he says it's good? when the student graduates he can obtain a home edition for under $300 -- which seems affordable for someone professionally employed. Mike > > > Will you get ready within finite time with the task you might do > > in a week using the professional tools? > > I agree with this. But what if one does not see a favorable return on > the investment? > Peltio
- References:
- Re: Mathematica 7.0.1.0 and some General Comments
- From: Peltio <peltio@twilight.zone>
- Re: Mathematica 7.0.1.0 and some General Comments