MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Wolfram/Alpha (Wikipedia page restored)

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg97382] Re: [mg97345] Re: Wolfram/Alpha (Wikipedia page restored)
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby at>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:18:40 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <> <001c01c9a248$b9b87b70$2d297250$@se>

Ingolf Dahl wrote:
> To be honest, Wolfram|Alpha is not THAT big at Google. I got 473000 hits for
> wolfram alpha, but if I look at hits 451-469, none of them refer to the
> Wolfram|Alpha project. If I put "Wolfram Alpha" (with citation marks) I get
> exactly 337 hits today. But that is at least more than 42 (base ten).
> Best regards
> Ingolf Dahl
> Sweden

This is odd. I checked it yesterday with the term in quotation marks and 
got 2.1 million. You get 337 today, but I get:

Results 1 - 10 of about 63,100 English pages for "wolfram alpha". (0.17 

So it changes from 337, to 63,100 to 2.1 million. I've no idea why that 
is. I'm using the double-quote opperators -i.e "   which I think is the 
correct thing to do.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Style for function calls?
  • Next by Date: General form of a summation as a function of 2 variables
  • Previous by thread: Re: Wolfram/Alpha (Wikipedia page restored)
  • Next by thread: RE: Re: Wolfram/Alpha (Wikipedia page restored)