R: Re: econometrics with mathematica?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg97774] R: [mg97747] Re: [mg97642] econometrics with mathematica?
- From: "tarpanelli at libero.it" <tarpanelli at libero.it>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 05:17:57 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-to: "tarpanelli at libero.it" <tarpanelli at libero.it>
Hello Minimus, from my experience if you are just a front-end user of econometrics models maybe softward package created ad-hoc may be more efficient than Mathematica, but if you are a model structurer or a quant I think that the symbolic features of Mathematica may be a very good advantage to validate and test your models p >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: cuak2000 at gmail.com >Data: 20/03/2009 8.41 >A: <mathgroup at smc.vnet.net> >Ogg: [mg97747] Re: [mg97642] econometrics with mathematica? > >Hello minimus...i've used mathematica here and there for econometrics, >though mostly for simple stuff... I don't think there is any reason why you >shouldn't use it, though I wouldn't know if there are many people who use >mathematica for professional econometrics (I know some people use Gauss, for >example). Personally, though Stata has a lot of stuff implemented, its >programming language is pretty arbitrary to my taste. >There are some econometrics packages for mathematica in the webpage which >you should check if you haven't done already. > >2009/3/17 minimus <spammergetthisemail at live.co.uk> > >> Dear All, >> >> How prevalently is mathematica used for econometric analysis? >> I am working and will always work with logit, probit models and maximum >> likelihood procedures. >> I will also do numerical simulation analysis of some integrals. >> >> For these and these kinds of purposes, would you recommend me to start with >> mathematica? >> Or shall I stick to any other package such as R, or Stata? >> >> What do you recommend? >> >> >> >> > > >-- >Por favor eviten enviarme archivos adjuntos de Word o Powerpoint ( >http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.es.html )