Re: Re: ToExpression[..,TexForm] does not seem

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg104458] Re: [mg104406] Re: [mg104351] ToExpression[..,TexForm] does not seem*From*: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>*Date*: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:59:10 -0500 (EST)*References*: <20091029225146.K51SM.569239.imail@eastrmwml30>*Reply-to*: drmajorbob at yahoo.com

> Your version number is under the menu > Mathematica | About Mathematica... That's the Front End version. In my case it says 32-bit, yet: $Version "7.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (February 19, 2009)" As you see, it's a 64-bit kernel. Bobby On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:48:27 -0500, Nasser M. Abbasi <nma at 12000.org> wrote: > > > >> >> The latest Mathematica version is available at >> >> http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/latestversion/ >> >> Your version number is under the menu >> >> Mathematica | About Mathematica... >> >> >> Bob Hanlon > > Thanks Bob. > > I do not know how to found this, becuase when I go to > > http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/index.html > > and from there, I do not see a link to this "latest version" page, and > that > where I was stuck. > > But thanks for the link, good to know there is a page there with this > info, > even though it seems unlinked from the main product page. > > --Nasser > > > >> >> ---- "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma at 12000.org> wrote: >> >> ============= >> Thanks, I can then only assume that this was a bug in version 7.0.0 and >> it >> was fixed in 7.0.1 >> >> my system says: >> >> "7.0 for Microsoft Windows (32-bit) (November 10, 2008)" >> >> rant about version numbers follows: >> >> Interesting that $Version prints 7.0 on my system like it does on yours >> below, but the date is different, mine says nov 10 2008 and yours says >> "February 19, 2009". >> >> I assume then you knew, somehow, from the date shown on your end that >> this >> is 7.0.1? It would have been nice if the version number would also have >> changed/updated to reflect this and not just the date! >> >> I noticed for sometime that WRI have something about showing version >> numbers, it is almost impossible to find what version numbers some of >> their >> products are at for some reason. >> >> For example, I spent sometime the other day trying to find exactly what >> version number is the current Mathematica at, and I could not. >> >> I think it is 7.0.2, or 7.2.0, but I am guessing as there is no place >> on >> WRI web site which says anything about this. >> >> If any one knows where to find this info, please let me know, as I'd >> like >> to >> keep my Mathematica version number page correct here >> >> http://12000.org/my_notes/compare_mathematica/index.htm >> >> >> --Nasser >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bob Hanlon" <hanlonr at cox.net> >> To: "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma at 12000.org>; <mathgroup at smc.vnet.net> >> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 7:33 PM >> Subject: Re: [mg104351] ToExpression[..,TexForm] does not seem to work >> on >> some Latex commands? >> >> >>> >>> I have version 7.0.1 >>> >>> $Version >>> >>> 7.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (February 19, 2009) >>> >>> s = TeXForm[Sum[f[n], {n, 1, m}]] >>> >>> \sum _{n=1}^m f(n) >>> >>> ToExpression["\\sum _{n=1}^m f(n)", TeXForm] >>> >>> Sum[f[n], {n, 1, m}] >>> >>> >>> Bob Hanlon >>> >>> ---- "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma at 12000.org> wrote: >>> >>> ============= >>> >>> From: "Bob Hanlon" >>> >>>> Put a space after sum in the TeX >>>> >>>> s = TeXForm[Sum[f[n], {n, 1, m}]] >>>> >>>> \sum _{n=1}^m f(n) >>>> >>>> Note the space after sum in the above output >>>> >>>> ToExpression["\\sum _{n=1}^m f(n)", TeXForm] >>>> >>>> Sum[f[n], {n, 1, m}] >>>> >>>> ToExpression["\\sum _ {n=1}^m f(n)", TeXForm] >>>> >>>> Sum[f[n], {n, 1, m}] >>>> >>>> >>>> Bob Hanlon >>>> >>> >>> >>> hello; >>> >>> I did. >>> >>> With or without space, I get the same error. Which version you used? I >>> am >>> using version 7 >>> >>> In[1]:= ToExpression["\\sum _{n=1}^m f(n)", TeXForm] >>> During evaluation of In[1]:= ToExpression::esntx:Could not parse \sum >>> _{n=1}^m f(n) as Mathematica input. >>> Out[1]= $Failed >>> >>> Thanks >>> --Nasser >>> >> > > -- DrMajorBob at yahoo.com

**Re: Converting Java into J/link runnable code**

**Re: Opportunities and Player Pro**

**Re: Converting Java into J/link runnable code**

**Re: Multiply 2 matrices where one contains differential**