Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Set::setps error? Twitter.m's OOP-like approach?


Erik Max Francis wrote:
> Daniel Lichtblau wrote:
>> Erik Max Francis wrote:
>>> I was experimenting with vaguely OOP-like wrappers around data similar 
>>> to how Twitter.m does things:
>>>
>>> 	http://blog.wolfram.com/2009/04/30/twittering-with-mathematica/
>>>
>>> I was experimenting with "mutable objects" and I'm running into a 
>>> scoping problem of some type that I don't understand.  Here's some 
>>> sample code creating a wrapper around an "account balance":
>>> [...hope I'm not snipping too much...]
> 
> Okay.  I see that since Mathematica is far more functional a language 
> than other languages that I've used and so what I was trying to do there 
> was quite alien -- sufficiently so that I really shouldn't try.  (In 
> this particular case, I was just taking a rather typical OOP example and 
> playing with it in Python, it wasn't central to my question below ...)

I'm not sure why this seems alien. People use such constructs in 
Mathematica quite often.


> [...]
> Well, when I boil down when I'm talking about here it's not so much OOP 
> per se but rather opaque types, giving the ability to pack lots of stuff 
> in an object, hide it with a nice face by using Format[..., Standard] := 
> ...., and then define a bunch of functions that take it at the first 
> argument and manipulate it.
> 
> The context I mentioned above is a tensor library where you don't really 
> want to see the components of the tensor unless you specifically ask for 
> it -- a 4-dimensional Riemann tensor, after all, has 4^4 components -- 
> but instead you just want to specify a set of coordinates, a metric 
> using those coordinates, and then go to town creating and manipulating 
> those tensors, then crank out specific calculations based on them.
> 
> Does that make more sense as being something reasonably Mathematica-ish, 
> using that approach for type opaqueness?

Yes. I see no reason not to do that in Mathematica. I won't say it is 
common, but people do use Mathematica in the way you describe. Often it 
is for similar reasons: hide the mess, expose the functionality (that 
may not be an entirely accurate paraphrasing of what you describe, but I 
think it is not too far from the mark).

Daniel Lichtblau
Wolfram Research




  • Prev by Date: Re: Formatting Numeric Outpuit
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica skill level snippet(s)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Set::setps error? Twitter.m's OOP-like approach?
  • Next by thread: Re: Set::setps error? Twitter.m's OOP-like approach?