Re: Re: Precision of AiryAi[0.0]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg103496] Re: [mg103479] Re: Precision of AiryAi[0.0]
- From: Mark McClure <mcmcclur at unca.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:57:02 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200909241149.HAA29080@smc.vnet.net>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrot= e: > No, the function is not returning a MachinePrecision number. For > example, note this: > Precision[Nest[Sqrt, AiryAi[0.0], 10^3]] > 316.985 > > As you can see, precision was considerably increased by nesting > square roots. Correct. If the precision of x is the number $MachinePrecision rather than the symbol MachinePrecision, then arbitrary precision arithmetic will kick in for computations involving x and this will be quite slow compared to the floating point computations used for MachinePrecision numbers. More to the point for my application, we see: Precision[Nest[AiryAi, 0.0, 100]] 225.079 Mark
- References:
- Re: Precision of AiryAi[0.0]
- From: Bill Rowe <readnews@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: Precision of AiryAi[0.0]