Re: Replacement Rule with Sqrt in denominator

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg114565] Re: Replacement Rule with Sqrt in denominator*From*: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>*Date*: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:39:43 -0500 (EST)

> Most importantly, he has never managed to get Daniel to concede any > ground at all on this point. Now, unless one assumes that Daniel is > just plain stubborn, or unable to see the obvious, or just totally > under the thumb of his "evil boss", this suggests that the case for > a bug is a weak one, I would say rather weaker than Hsiang's claim > to have proved the Kepler Conjecture (I am not even sure if it is > much stronger than the claim of Trul's machine). > > Andrzej Kozlowski Multiple choice! I was always fond of multiple choice. But where is "All of the above"? Daniel Lichtblau (totally worn out from the battle with the Evil Thumb) Wolfram Research PS On a different Usenet forum, not long ago, only the third option was offered. Not much there for multiple guessers. So I gave up on that forum.