Re: Bug? Analytical integration of cosines gets the sign wrong
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg107183] Re: [mg107168] Bug? Analytical integration of cosines gets the sign wrong
- From: Louis Talman <talmanl at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:20:20 -0500 (EST)
- References: <201002041132.GAA00336@smc.vnet.net>
On Feb 4, 2010, at 4:32 AM, K wrote: > the analytical integration in Mathematica 7.01.0 on Linux x86 (64bit) > > faultyInt = > Integrate[Cos[ph]*1/Pi*Cos[4*ph]*Cos[2*ph], {ph, Pi, 3/2*Pi}] > > gives as result: > > 19/(105 \[Pi]) I get the same (incorrect) thing on an iMac running v7.01.0 under OS X 10.5.8. However if one computes first the indefinite integral and then substitutes the limits, one gets the negative---which is correct. v6.0.1.0 and v5.0.1.0 both do the definite integration correctly. Evidently v7 makes a bad choice of contour somewhere. --Lou Talman Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Metropolitan State College of Denver <http://rowdy.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>
- References:
- Bug? Analytical integration of cosines gets the sign wrong
- From: K <kgspga@googlemail.com>
- Bug? Analytical integration of cosines gets the sign wrong