MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: algebraic numbers

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg106175] Re: [mg106161] Re: algebraic numbers
  • From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:58:26 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <hhc7a1$2o2$> <>
  • Reply-to: drmajorbob at

The simplest algorithm for determining "what's the next term" is simply  
"fill in the first bubble".


On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:42:21 -0600, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at>  

> On 2 Jan 2010, at 19:05, DrMajorBob wrote:
>> If one had the Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences handy, those SAT
>> questions could be interesting. But they'd still be nonsense.
> I think only their wording should be changed to something like: "find
> the simplest formula generating the sequence ...  where simplest means
> requiring the least number of standard mathematical symbols to write
> down". These kind of questions, of course, should probably allow the
> possibility that the person answering the question finds an answer that
> is simpler than the expected one.

DrMajorBob at

  • Prev by Date: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • Next by Date: Re: algebraic numbers
  • Previous by thread: Re: algebraic numbers
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: algebraic numbers