MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: algebraic numbers

I am not sure I you can call that a "forumla". Besides

StringLength["fill in the first bubble"]


So, if we also include them in the simplicity test, this one is probably 
not going to pass.

On 4 Jan 2010, at 07:38, DrMajorBob wrote:

> The simplest algorithm for determining "what's the next term" is 
simply "fill in the first bubble".
> Bobby
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:42:21 -0600, Andrzej Kozlowski 
<akoz at> wrote:
>> On 2 Jan 2010, at 19:05, DrMajorBob wrote:
>>> If one had the Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences handy, those SAT
>>> questions could be interesting. But they'd still be nonsense.
>> I think only their wording should be changed to something like: "find
>> the simplest formula generating the sequence ...  where simplest 
>> requiring the least number of standard mathematical symbols to write
>> down". These kind of questions, of course, should probably allow the
>> possibility that the person answering the question finds an answer 
>> is simpler than the expected one.
> --
> DrMajorBob at

  • Prev by Date: Re: algebraic numbers
  • Next by Date: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • Previous by thread: Re: algebraic numbers
  • Next by thread: Re: algebraic numbers