Re: Re: Re: algebraic numbers

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg106262] Re: [mg106220] Re: [mg106192] Re: algebraic numbers*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at akikoz.net>*Date*: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:02:18 -0500 (EST)*References*: <200912290620.BAA02732@smc.vnet.net> <hhpl0g$9l1$1@smc.vnet.net> <201001050647.BAA24123@smc.vnet.net> <E44EA2F2-1274-43E8-93DE-DC5BD31884A5@mimuw.edu.pl> <op.u52ai6jwtgfoz2@bobbys-imac.local> <504E0A05-61DB-4A43-9637-68216076623C@mimuw.edu.pl> <E1A12FAF-664F-46B6-BB65-AA6C134EB1B8@mimuw.edu.pl>

On 6 Jan 2010, at 07:39, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote: > Just one more comment, I hope my last one on this subject. Obviously RandomReal make it choices out of a countable set of entities. One would have to be insane to claim otherwise and I am not that yet. > In fact, of course, not even countable but finite. But this is all beside the point for the important thing is not what these things *are* but what Mathematica interpret them as. Even finite state automata can simulate distributions defined on real intervals where "essentially everything" consists of non-comptable reals.

**References**:**Re: Re: algebraic numbers***From:*DrMajorBob <btreat1@austin.rr.com>