Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg106526] Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness*From*: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>*Date*: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:20:13 -0500 (EST)*Organization*: Stanford University*References*: <200912300915.EAA17299@smc.vnet.net> <hhhmkr$o7g$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <hhhmkr$o7g$1 at smc.vnet.net>, Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote: > To my mind, the only possible surprise here -- simply because I never > looked at it before, concerns -Infinity. But anything concerning > infinite quantities is bound to be so special that nothing about > handling of Infinity would really surprise me. Agreed -- I'd also be extremely cautious in that limit. But I behaving differently (AFAIK) from every other single-character symbol in the alphabet? (esp. E and Pi)

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness***From:*Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>