[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg106528] Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
• From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
• Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:20:36 -0500 (EST)
• Organization: Stanford University
• References: <200912300915.EAA17299@smc.vnet.net> <hhhmn8$o9t$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <hhhmn8$o9t$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
 Leonid Shifrin <lshifr at gmail.com> wrote:

>  It would perhaps be nice if such
> cases were more systematically documented, but they have nothing to do with
> bugs, as Daniel Lichtblau and many others already explained.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Regards,
> Leonid

Thanks for shared reaction on documentation (though I don't think that 
problem will be solved soon).

I'm not sure I ever called this a bug -- but in any case "product 
defect" is a characterization I'll stick with.