[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
Thanks David. Good point. But, my example was just to illustrate in principle. My actual needed usage is in much more complicated expressions. Thanks again, Dave David Park wrote: > Why should it Simplify d? NestedLessLess has no built-in meaning. And even > if it did mean that b << a there is no reason that Mathematica should still > set b to zero. It doesn't even know if a and b are real positive. You will > have to set it to zero yourself. > > d /. b -> 0 > a > > For more complicated expressions you might have to use Limit. > > > David Park > djmpark at comcast.net > http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/ > > > > From: dbird [mailto:dbird at ieee.org] > > Please excuse if this has been answered before, but I can't find it. > > Is there some way to do a Simplify with assumptions using a > NestedLessLess or something similar? For example: > > d=a+b > Simplify[d,NestedLessLess[a,b]] > > Answer is: > a+b > > Answer should be: > b > > Thanks, > > Dave > > > >