Re: Re: Mathematica and LaTeX
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg108081] Re: [mg108032] Re: Mathematica and LaTeX
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 06:11:14 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
- References: <201003041027.FAA26613@smc.vnet.net> <hmqivo$shc$1@smc.vnet.net> <201003070901.EAA00140@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu
I never systematically checked the size comparison of exported .eps vs. .pdf. But I seem to recall that it is not unusual to have .eps larger. On 3/7/2010 4:01 AM, AES wrote: > In article<hmqivo$shc$1 at smc.vnet.net>, > Murray Eisenberg<murray at math.umass.edu> wrote: > >> That's a common problem that is easily solved in either of two ways: >> >> (1) Process the LaTeX file with pdfTeX so as to directly convert from >> .tex source to .pdf output. This should avoid the bounding box problem. >> >> (2) Instead of doing the Mathematica Export to .pdf, Export to .eps. >> Next, run an ordinary LaTeX processor that produces .dvi output. >> Finally, convert from .dvi to .ps and then from .ps to .eps. >> >> I do (2) all the time, since I get the quickest workflow that way. But I >> use (1) sometimes, too. > > Do your exported .eps files typically end up being much larger than the > corresponding .pdf files? > -- Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu Mathematics & Statistics Dept. Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H) University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W) 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801 Amherst, MA 01003-9305
- References:
- Mathematica and LaTeX
- From: Jim Lambaugh <lambaugh@gmail.com>
- Re: Mathematica and LaTeX
- From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu>
- Mathematica and LaTeX