MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Dot product confusion

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg109961] Re: Dot product confusion
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
  • Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 07:10:34 -0400 (EDT)

The dot product is not commutative in general and the examples in the Documentation Center for Dot explicitly show this (Examples/Basic Examples/Products of matrices and vectors).


Bob Hanlon

---- "S. B. Gray" <stevebg at ROADRUNNER.COM> wrote: 

=============
Given

ptsa = {{x1, y1, z1}, {x2, y2, z2}, {x3, y3, z3}};

I  thought the following expressions would be identical:

{aa, bb, cc}.ptsa  (* expression 1 *)
ptsa.{aa, bb, cc}  (* expression 2 *)

but they are not. They evaluate respectively as:

{aa x1 + bb x2 + cc x3, aa y1 + bb y2 + cc y3,
aa z1 + bb z2 + cc z3}

{aa x1 + bb y1 + cc z1, aa x2 + bb y2 + cc z2,
  aa x3 + bb y3 + cc z3}

Since ptsa is itself three xyz coordinates, the expressions might be 
ambiguous, but I assumed the dot product would always commute. Should 
there be a warning?

The first result is the one I want.

Steve Gray



  • Prev by Date: Re: Dot product confusion
  • Next by Date: Re: Scroll content inside InputField?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Dot product confusion
  • Next by thread: Re: Dot product confusion