Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: pure function

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg113721] Re: pure function
  • From: Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:52:22 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <ib8k3m$659$1@smc.vnet.net>

On Nov 8, 2:40 am, Stephan <stschif... at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Ah, I forgot a follow up:
>
> What if I don't want to use a constant like in the example I stated?
> What if I want to compute the local value of a in the module and
> return the computed value instead of the symbol? I am kind of
> looking for a general way to evaluate a part of an expression
> within the delayed evaluation of the function body.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephan

In[1]:= getFunk := Module[{a=2}, With[{b=a^2}, Function[{x}, b * x]]]

In[2]:= g = getFunk

Out[2]= Function[{x$},4 x$]

>
> Am 08.11.2010 um 09:20 schrieb Leonid Shifrin:
>
>> Stephan,
>>
>> Yes, sure, use With instead of Module:
>>
>> In[2]:== getFunc:==With[{a==2},Function[{x},a*x]]
>>
>> In[3]:== f==getFunc
>>
>> Out[3]== Function[{x$},2 x$]
>>
>> So, by using Module, you can create a closure whose state (variable <a>
>> in this case) comes from surrounding context but can be modified by it
>> at a later time. Using With gets you a textual substitution of a value that
>> a given expression had, at the moment when With was invoked.
>>
>> You can also accomplish your goal somewhat differently, by redefining your getFunc:
>>
>> In[4]:==
>> Clear[getFunc];
>> getFunc[y_] :== Function[{x}, y*x]
>>
>> In[6]:== getFunc[2]
>>
>> Out[6]== Function[{x$}, 2 x$]
>>
>> The semantics of parameter-passing in Mathematica is somewhat similar to With:
>> parameters are textually substituted to the body before the body starts to evaluate.
>> There are a few subtle differences (related to name collision resolution in nested
>> scoping constructs), but they do not show up in this particular case.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Leonid
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Stephan <stschif... at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a function that returns a pure function:
>>>
>>> In[1]:== getFunc :== Module[{a==2}, Function[{x}, a * x]]
>>>
>>> In[2]:== f == getFunc
>>>
>>> Out[2]== Function[{x$}, a$57 x$]
>>>
>>> Is there any way, to have the body of the returned function contain the
>>> actual _value_ of the local variable a, instead of the _symbol_ ?
>>> So I would like the returned function to be written as
>>>
>>>        Function[{x$}, 2 x$]
>>>
>>> The reason is, that I would like to have a quick way to actually see the
>>> value instead of digging out the local variable a$57...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Stephan


  • Prev by Date: Re: x and y labels in ArrayPlot
  • Next by Date: Re: Graphics: How to get values corresponding to
  • Previous by thread: Re: pure function
  • Next by thread: Re: pure function