Re: How to short-circuit match failure?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg114271] Re: How to short-circuit match failure?
• From: Peter Breitfeld <phbrf at t-online.de>
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:09:17 -0500 (EST)
• References: <ictfq8\$mck\$1@smc.vnet.net>

You may try something like this:

Clear[foo];
foo::toolong = "List is too long";
foo::nolist = "First argument is not a list";
foo::nargs = "foo called with `1` argument(s); 2 expected";
foo[p___] :=
Which[
Length[{p}] =!= 2, Message[foo::nargs, Length[{p}]]; Abort[],
Length[{p}[[1]]] > 2, Message[foo::toolong]; Abort[],
True, ({#, {p}[[2]]} &) /@ {p}[[1]]
]

I made p an arbitrary parameter. In the Which statement you have to use
{p} to get the list of the arguments passed.
If you want your Input returned, you can replace the Abort[] with

Return[HoldForm[foo][p]]

foo[x_List/;Length[x]<3,y_]    then you will get:

In:= foo[{1,2,3},3]
Out= foo[{1,2,3},3]

without any message, because your argument doesn't match the definition.

kj wrote:

> When defining a function as a sequence of rules (with SetDelayed),
> I often want to have messages emitted if the arguments do not have
> the proper form, and then *stop* trying any remaining rules, but
> I don't know how to do the latter.
>
> Here's a silly example:
>
> ClearAll[foo]
> foo::toolong = "List is too long";
> foo::nolist = "First argument is not a list";
> foo::nargs = "foo called with `1` argument(s); 2 expected";
> foo[x_List /; Length[x] < 3, y_] := {#, y} & /@ x
> foo[x_List, y_] /; Message[foo::toolong] = Null
> foo[x_, y_] /; Message[foo::nolist] = Null
> foo[x___] /; Message[foo::nargs, Length[{x}]] = Null
>
> The function foo takes as its first argument a list with length no
> greater than 2.  But see what happens when foo[{1, 2, 3}, 3] is
> evaluated:
>
> In[86]:= foo[{1, 2, 3}, 3]
> During evaluation of In[86]:= foo::toolong: List is too long
> During evaluation of In[86]:= foo::nolist: First argument is not a list
> During evaluation of In[86]:= foo::nargs: foo called with 2 argument(s); 2 expected
> Out[86]= foo[{1, 2, 3}, 3]
>
> The result in Out[86] is as desired, but spurious messages were
> emitted.  It's easy to see why.  During the evaluation of foo[{1,
> 2, 3}, 3], *all* the rules associated with foo are tried, even
> though the third and fourth ones should not be.
>
> I can prevent this from happening by letting the second rule's
> match succeed; e.g. by defining it like this:
>
> foo[x_List, y_] := (Message[foo::toolong]; Null)
>
> ...but now evaluating foo[{1, 2, 3}, 3] no longer produces the right
> final result (it produces Null, instead of foo[{1, 2, 3}, 3]).
>
> How can I define the second rule for foo so that the third and
> fourth ones are not tried, while the final value for foo[{1, 2,
> 3}, 3] remains as foo[{1, 2, 3}, 3]?
>
> TIA!
>
> ~kj
>
>

--
_________________________________________________________________
Peter Breitfeld, Bad Saulgau, Germany -- http://www.pBreitfeld.de

• Prev by Date: Re: Rendering transparent objects changed in M8
• Next by Date: Re: Extract[expr, Position[expr, patt], h]
• Previous by thread: Re: How to short-circuit match failure?
• Next by thread: Reasons for a two-dimensional layout (was Re: Mathematica 8 docs online now!)