|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re-virginating Manipulates?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg114291] Re: Re-virginating Manipulates?
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:03:35 -0500 (EST)
At 2:48 PM +0200 11/29/10, Herman Kuun wrote:
>One suggestion:-
>
>Remove["`*"]; demo_a (* Cell one *)
>
>Remove["`*"]; demo_b (* Cell two *)
>
>:
>:
>Remove["`*"]; demo_last (* Cell last *)
>
>Best
>Herman
Thank you!
I had tried
Remove["Global`*"]; demo_a (* Cell one *)
and now I guess I (sort of) understand why this didn't do what was needed.
[Still wondering a bit, however, why the syntax isn't
Remove["*`*"]; OR Remove["$Current`*"];
or something similar? Note that (so far I can see) the Context
Tutorial does NOT give any illustration of the syntax "`*" (or `*)
as a valid syntax.]
Prev by Date:
C compiler error Mathematica 8 and Cuda
Next by Date:
Re: Why ParallelTable does not use CUDA
Previous by thread:
Re-virginating Manipulates?
Next by thread:
Re: Re-virginating Manipulates?
|