MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re-virginating Manipulates?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg114291] Re: Re-virginating Manipulates?
  • From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 04:03:35 -0500 (EST)

At 2:48 PM +0200 11/29/10, Herman Kuun wrote:
>One suggestion:-
>
>Remove["`*"]; demo_a   (* Cell one *)
>
>Remove["`*"]; demo_b (* Cell two *)
>
>:
>:
>Remove["`*"]; demo_last (* Cell last *)
>
>Best
>Herman

Thank you!

I had tried

	Remove["Global`*"];  demo_a   (* Cell one *)

and now I guess I (sort of) understand why this didn't do what was needed.

[Still wondering a bit, however, why the syntax isn't

	Remove["*`*"];   OR  Remove["$Current`*"];

or something similar?  Note that (so far I can see) the Context 
Tutorial does NOT give any illustration of the syntax "`*"  (or `*) 
as a valid syntax.]


  • Prev by Date: C compiler error Mathematica 8 and Cuda
  • Next by Date: Re: Why ParallelTable does not use CUDA
  • Previous by thread: Re-virginating Manipulates?
  • Next by thread: Re: Re-virginating Manipulates?