Re: Recognize multiple outputs
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg118094] Re: Recognize multiple outputs
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:57:13 -0400 (EDT)
Make all those cells initialization cells. After changing inputs, choose Evaluation>Evaluate initialization cells. Bobby On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 06:06:45 -0500, mailcwc at gmail.com <mailcwc at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4=E6=9C=8810=E6=97=A5, =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=886=E6=99=8201=E5=88=86, David > Ba= > iley <d... at removedbailey.co.uk> wrote: >> >> However, I would strongly recommend that you think again about the way >> you work. Input cells containing multiple calculations, are probably >> best split into separate cells. You can do this very easily by putting >> the cursor at the right place, and selecting the menu item Call/Divide >> Cell. >> >> Very large expressions are often the result of a number of previous >> steps, and it may be better to re-execute those steps to re-derive the >> large expressions unless this is too time consuming. It is horribly easy >> for a mistake to lurk in a large expression - particularly if it has >> been entered by hand! >> >> Another general tip, is to keep a calculation symbolic as long as >> possible, so that it is easy to read and understand what is going on. >> Numbers can usually be injected at the last possible step. >> >> David Baileyhttp://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk > > Hi, David, thanks for your tip. > I have thought about breaking the cell into smaller ones. > In my workflow, the cell will be recalculated with some variables > modified. > If the whole calculation is not in one single cell, > I have to press Shift+Enter for each of the smaller cells. > And I bet I will miss some cell sometimes and get the wrong answer in > the end. > > > > > -- DrMajorBob at yahoo.com