|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg116542] Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
- From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 05:12:25 -0500 (EST)
Kevin J. McCann wrote:
> I believe that was his really long 10th anniversary speech, and I recall
> that he did say that it was the only time the company lost significant
> money after the initial startup.
>
> Kevin
Mathematica 2.2 came out I think early in 1993. Mathematica 3.0 appeared
around October of 1996. It is possible that Wolfram Research lost money
at some point during those years, though I think we were told the the
year-by-year figures were all (perhaps ever so slightly) in the black.
I mention this simply to point out that any significant loss of revenue
would have been almost certainly due to a very long development cycle,
rather than to the particulars of business management at that time. I
doubt the then-COO was supportive of that long cycle with no
intermediate releases.
I will take this opportunity to mention that I do not in general speak
for my employer. In this instance I quite certainly am not doing so.
Daniel Lichtblau
Wolfram Research
> On 2/17/2011 5:21 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>> I vaguely recall the following, paraphrased, statement by Stephen
>> Wolfram at one of the conferences his company organized. At one point,
>> he brought in business people to run the business aspect of the company,
>> and it was a big mistake. (He may even have said that was the only time
>> the company didn't make a profit; that's the part I don't recall at all
>> precisely.)
>>
>> On 2/16/2011 4:34 AM, AES wrote:
>>> 3) I don't think Wolfram is much interested in what my business model
>>> for Mathematica would be (and that might be good judgement on their
>>> part!). But if they asked, I'd say that I'd like a tiered or modular
>>> (or whatever you want to call it) approach where increasing more capable
>>> versions of Mathematica were available at increasing price points --
>>> just like most every other product in the marketplace.
Prev by Date:
Re: problem with NDSolve::dvnoarg:
Next by Date:
Re: NInegrate Bug
Previous by thread:
Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
Next by thread:
Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
|