|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Summed Area Table / Integral Image
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg115413] Re: Summed Area Table / Integral Image
- From: Peter Pein <petsie at dordos.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:39:44 -0500 (EST)
- References: <igbng6$hfs$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 09.01.2011 08:18, Gareth Edwards wrote:
> Next newbie question....
>
> Suppose I have a 2D matrix, what would be a neat syntax for computed the
> 'Integral Image' or summed area table? (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summed_area_table )
>
> Many thanks in advance for any neat suggestions.
>
> Best,
>
> Gareth
>
Hi Gareth,
if I understand the article correctly,
In[1]:= sat[m_]:=Map[Accumulate,m,{0,1}]
should do what you want
In[2]:= TableForm@sat@ConstantArray[1,{5,3}]
Out[2]//TableForm=
1 2 3
2 4 6
3 6 9
4 8 12
5 10 15
Cheers,
Peter
Prev by Date:
Re: original meaning of System` functions
Next by Date:
ParsedBoxWrapper's in packages
Previous by thread:
Summed Area Table / Integral Image
Next by thread:
Re: Summed Area Table / Integral Image
|