Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: About Table

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg115987] Re: About Table
  • From: olfa mraihi <olfa.mraihi at yahoo.fr>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 06:14:55 -0500 (EST)

I agree but :
1)how can I maintain Table as a list  even if its bounds are not defined?
2)if it is not possible how can I replace Table by a function that has the same meaning but can works with symbolic bounds?

--- En date de : Jeu 27.1.11, DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com> a =E9crit :


De: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
Objet: Re: [mg115951] About Table
=C0: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net, "olfa" <olfa.mraihi at yahoo.fr>
Date: Jeudi 27 janvier 2011, 23h12


I'd guess that Max saw only one argument (the Table, which is not a list at that point, as N is not defined), and the Max of one thing is that thing.

Bobby

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:40:21 -0600, olfa <olfa.mraihi at yahoo.fr> wrote:

> Hi Mathematica community,
>
> when evaluating this input (with shift+enter):
> m + Max[Table[A[index1], {index1, i, N}]]
>
> I obtain the output:
> m + Table[A[index1], {index1, i, N}]
>
> How to explain why the function Max wasn't maintained (I mean why it
> was ignored by mathematica)???!!!
>
> Thank you very much.
>


--DrMajorBob at yahoo.com


  • Prev by Date: Re: Vector problem
  • Next by Date: Re: About Table
  • Previous by thread: Re: About Table
  • Next by thread: Re: About Table