MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?


U¿ytkownik "Noqsi" <noqsiaerospace at gmail.com> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci grup 
dyskusyjnych:iv6gf9$ruo$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> On Jul 7, 5:40 am, "slawek" <sla... at host.pl> wrote:
>
>> The convention that 2.0 is less accurate than 2.00 is applied ONLY in
>> Mathematica (the computer program).
>
> Not true. This is a long-standing convention in experimental science.

There is no such convention. There is always possible that 2.00 +- 0.53 .

Nobody should believe that 2.00 is more exact than 2.0 or even 2 . (If so, 
then 2 Pi have got 10% std. dev. ;)
 



  • Prev by Date: Help Plotting director fields
  • Next by Date: Re: sequence of functions
  • Previous by thread: Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
  • Next by thread: Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?