|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg120323] Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:54:59 -0400 (EDT)
Then there's Paul Halmos's famous article title, "Applied Mathematics Is
Bad Mathematics."
On 7/18/11 6:14 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2011, at 12:02, Richard Fateman wrote:
>
>> I think your comment might be more aptly directed toward the study of
>> pure math. Since I've raised the hackles of the physicists, why not
>> poke the mathematicians in the eye too. (My Phd is in Applied Math, my
>> bachelor's degree is in Physics [&math]).
>
> Well, OK. Vladimir Arnold quotes Poincare as saying:
>
> "There is no Applied Mathematics, there are only applications of mathematics."
>
> Would that explain certain things?
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski
>
--
Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
Re: I think Omitting the multiplication sign is a big mistake
Next by Date:
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
Previous by thread:
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
Next by thread:
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
|