MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Evaluating WeierstrassP at large arguments

The WeierstrassP function is doubly periodic. Do the numerical evaluation
routines for this function take this into account when evaluating for large
arguments, using a Mod function on the argument?  If not, would there be
something to be gained by the user writing a "front end" for
WeierstrassP[z,{g2,g3}] moving z to the principal period parallelogram?
Especially if g2 and g3 were fixed and z was scanned only along the
direction of one half-period.


I'm thinking of something like a high precision mod function followed by a
MachinePrecision evaluation of WeierstrassP.


My experience has been that calculating the half-periods from g2-g3 has a
fair loss of significance but if we only had to calculate them once we could
afford extra high precision.


David Park

djmpark at


  • Prev by Date: Mathematica 8 remote parallel kernels
  • Next by Date: FinancialData errors
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica 8 remote parallel kernels
  • Next by thread: Indeterminate result (numerical problem)