[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
can't Solve[1 - x == x^r, x]?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg119936] can't Solve[1 - x == x^r, x]?
*From*: Scott Centoni <scentoni at hotmail.com>
*Date*: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:31:33 -0400 (EDT)
I want to solve the equation
1 - x == x^r (1)
for x[r] and for r[x], particularly in the region 0<=r<=1 and 0<=x<=1/2 where both are real. Solving for r works well:
> In[1]:= Solve[1 - x == x^r, r]
>
> During evaluation of In[1]:= Solve::ifun: Inverse functions are being used by Solve, so some solutions may not be found; use Reduce for complete solution information. >>
>
> Out[1]= {{r -> Log[1 - x]/Log[x]}}
However solving for x does not:
> In[2]:= Solve[1 - x == x^r, x]
>
> During evaluation of In[2]:= Solve::tdep: The equations appear to involve the variables to be solved for in an essentially non-algebraic way. >>
>
> Out[2]= Solve[1 - x == x^r, x]
I've tried Reduce and InverseFunction, but they just left the expression unevaluated. For plotting purposes, I used
> Nx[r_] := x /. FindRoot[1 - x == x^r, {x, .13}]
> Plot[{.5 r^.5, .5 r, Nx[r]}, {r, 0, 1}]
The plot is fairly close to .5 r^.5 over this interval, if that helps. Is there really no way for Mathematica to express this function other than as a numerical expression like this? Not even a big, messy formula involving PolyLog and hypergeometric functions?
Thanks,
Scott Centoni
Prev by Date:
**Re: Improt vs Get**
Next by Date:
**Re: End of Sound**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Improt vs Get**
Next by thread:
**Re: can't Solve[1 - x == x^r, x]?**
| |