MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: evaluation-- one or many levels, your thoughts?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg116943] Re: evaluation-- one or many levels, your thoughts?
  • From: Richard Fateman <fateman at eecs.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 06:06:18 -0500 (EST)

On 3/4/2011 9:38 AM, DrMajorBob wrote:
> x1:=x2
> x2:=x3
> x1
>
> x3
>
yes, I know.  Mathematica does "infinite" evaluation, as I said in
my note :)

The question remains.  If in this circumstance Mathematica returned x2,
would the programs that you wrote, and the commands you have actually
used, behave differently?   I know that we can make up commands that
show the difference, but do you suppose that matters?

(say your programs ran 30% faster and took 20% less room?)

RJF




  • Prev by Date: Re: Custom Autoloaded Functions
  • Next by Date: Re: Custom Autoloaded Functions
  • Previous by thread: evaluation-- one or many levels, your thoughts?
  • Next by thread: Re: evaluation-- one or many levels, your thoughts?