MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: LUDecomposition

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg117733] Re: LUDecomposition
  • From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:15:57 -0500 (EST)

Kevin wrote:
> LUDecomposition[{{1, 2}, {3, 4}}]
> and
> LUDecomposition[{{3, 4}, {1, 2}}]
> both give the same output:
> {{{1, 2}, {3, -2}}, {1, 2}, 1}
> 
> Only the output for the first matrix is correct.
> 
> Alpha gives the same incorrect results for the 2nd matrix
> correct 1st matrix: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=LUDecomposition+{{1%2C2}%2C{3%2C4}}
> incorrect 2nd matrix: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=LUDecomposition+{{3%2C4}%2C{1%2C2}}
> 

In versions I tried, I get for the second case

LUDecomposition[{{3, 4}, {1, 2}}]

Out[1]= {{{1, 2}, {3, -2}}, {2, 1}, 1}

This is correct.

I am not sure if Wolfram|Alpha is correct. Possibly it is failing to 
account for the permutation vector.

Daniel Lichtblau
Wolfram Research


  • Prev by Date: Re: Capture values that Min(imize)
  • Next by Date: Re: About C[i]
  • Previous by thread: Re: LUDecomposition
  • Next by thread: Re: LUDecomposition