|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: nested findroot
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg122802] Re: nested findroot
- From: Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 04:53:05 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <j9genv$p2n$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Nov 10, 4:06 am, Anna McCuan <anna.mcc... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm getting an error finding a root using functions which are defined
> using findroot. This happens in spite of the fact that I can graph
> the function and see clearly that there is an easy to find root.
> Does anyone know how to execute this root search successfully?
>
> The file is posted publicly at
> http://www.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/temp/problem.nb
Change the definitions of f and g so that
they apply only when the argument is numeric:
f[w_?NumericQ] := ...
g[w_?NumericQ] := ...
FindRoot[g[soln] - 9 f[soln] == 0, {soln, .13}]
{soln -> 0.131216}
Prev by Date:
large integration result for simple problem: 1/x,, also BesselJ
Next by Date:
Re: AspectRatio -> 1 vs AspectRatio ->1.25
Previous by thread:
Re: nested findroot
Next by thread:
Question on two-stage optimization of polynomials: how to draw a response function?
|