[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
What is the point of having Initializations in DynamicModule and Manipulate?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg122983] What is the point of having Initializations in DynamicModule and Manipulate?
*From*: Armand Tamzarian <mike.honeychurch at gmail.com>
*Date*: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:46:53 -0500 (EST)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
I'd be interested in feedback from other users about the way in which
Initializations works within DynamicModule (and Manipulate?). It is
fair to say that I expected an initialization to occur "initially."
That is to say I expected Initialization content to be evaluated prior
to the body of the DynamicModule. I have exchanged emails with tech
support about this. Attached is an example sent to me by tech support.
ClearAll[plot, g];
(* and in a separate cell *)
DynamicModule[{c}, {plot, Slider[Dynamic[c]], g[Dynamic@c]},
Initialization :> (g[x_] := Cos[x]; plot = Plot[g[x], {x, 1, 10}]),
UntrackedVariables -> {g}]
It is important for this example to keep the ClearAll line in a
separate cell so that the global variables are only cleared once. On
my system (OS X 10.6.8, Mma 8.0.4) the output is a list
{plot, "slider", g[0.]}
where "slider" is the actual rendered slider but plot is the word
(unset variable) plot. In other words Global`plot has no value at the
time the body of the DynamicModule is evaluated. Ditto Global`g.
If you evaluated the cell (the second cell with the DynamicModule) a
second time a plot graphic appears in the list and g[0.] becomes
Cos[0.]. This is not surprising because Global`plot and Global`g now
have a value.
Wolfram have indicated that this is working as designed -- which is
presumably why this example was sent to me of how this should work. If
that is the case it seems poorly designed because (and it is here I
would like feedback) users would expect initializations to be
evaluated prior to the body of the DynamicModule -- otherwise what is
the point?
I'd appreciate the thoughts of other users about this.
Additionally I have been told by Wolfram that wrapping Dynamic around
the variable(s) that are not being evaluated will trigger the
evaluation. But why would a user want to make plot or g Dynamic? It
seems to me that the entire purpose of having an Initialization is to
evaluate this "one off" variable/functions.
thanks
Mike
Prev by Date:
**Integrating a rotated function inbetween two circles**
Next by Date:
**Re: How to force integers**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Data binning with CUDA**
Next by thread:
**Re: What is the point of having Initializations in**
| |