|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Texture in version 8, fine, but don't export...?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg121385] Re: Texture in version 8, fine, but don't export...?
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:19:59 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <j44jpj$8vb$1@smc.vnet.net> <201109070940.FAA21529@smc.vnet.net> <j4a1s5$42h$1@smc.vnet.net> <201109120823.EAA20964@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu
So far as I can recall, there _are_ instances of folks printing 3D from
Mathematica on those expensive machines. In fact, I have a small
sculpture, received as a gift, that allegedly was designed and printed
using Mathematica. But whether the printing was directly from
Mathematica or through some intermediary export format I don't know.
On 9/12/11 4:23 AM, Roger Bagula wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2:28 am, Murray Eisenberg<mur... at math.umass.edu> wrote:
>> Just a quick suggestion without my trying it here...
>>
>> Try exporting to PostScript, view that with GhostView, say. Only then
>> use some graphics utility to convert to the formats you require.
>>
>> It's been the case, in the past at least, that even direct export to pdf
>> can lose some graphics features, but exporting first to .eps and then
>> converting that to .pdf works.
>>
> Those eps and pdf are 2d graphics files:
> the export I'm talking about is to ray trace
> and 3d printers as in 3ds and obj files with mtl color files.
>
>
--
Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
Re: a question about data plotting
Next by Date:
Re: help to make code run faster (mathematica v8.01)
Previous by thread:
Re: Texture in version 8, fine, but don't export...?
Next by thread:
Re: Texture in version 8, fine, but don't export...?
|