|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg125943] Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object
- From: Zach Bjornson <bjornson at stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 04:17:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <201204060958.FAA22979@smc.vnet.net> <jlp36a$15k$1@smc.vnet.net>
Mathematica's objects like FittedModel are examples of something like
OOP. See Darren's post about making these sorts of objects here:
http://forums.wolfram.com/mathgroup/archive/2011/Jan/msg00336.html
On Apr 7, 2:59 am, Ralph Dratman <ralph.drat... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bobby,
>
> Please explain how you mean this. It is not a technique I have been
> able to find in the Virtual Book or other documentation.
>
> What corresponds to a class, and how does one use a class to create
> one or more object instances? How does one run a method from an
> object?
>
> A brief example would be most helpful.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:58 AM, DrMajorBob <btre... at austin.rr.com> wrote:
> > Mathematica is already object-oriented WITHOUT all that. What a lot of
> > overhead for nothing.
>
> > Bobby
>
> > On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 04:49:54 -0500, Nasser M. Abbasi <n... at 12000.org> wrote:
>
> >> Just FYI,
>
> >> I wrote this small note on using Mathematica for object-based
> >> programming. I found that it works really well for me.
>
> >> Nothing too advanced, just a simple way of using Module[] but
> >> in a way to emulate object based programming that I did not know
> >> about before.
>
> >>http://12000.org/my_notes/object_based_in_mathematica/v1.html
>
> >> --Nasser
>
> > --
> > DrMajor... at yahoo.com
Prev by Date:
Re: Stuck solving recurrence formula
Next by Date:
Re: evaluate to True?
Previous by thread:
Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object
Next by thread:
Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object
|