[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Complex and Solve
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg125143] Re: Complex and Solve
*From*: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357 at gmail.com>
*Date*: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:57:56 -0500 (EST)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
*References*: <201202211115.GAA08330@smc.vnet.net>
Actually I should have checked, with version 8 Solve can handle
inequalities so either Reduce or Solve works here.
$Assumptions = rfe > 0 && l > 0;
r = 1;
\[Omega] = 300;
vrms = 2;
irms = 1/2;
\[Phi] = 30 Degree;
impedance = r + 1/(1/rfe + 1/(I \[Omega] l)) // FullSimplify;
voltage = vrms (Cos[\[Phi]] + I Sin[\[Phi]]) // Simplify;
Solve[{irms == voltage/impedance, $Assumptions}, {rfe,
l}][[1]] // FullSimplify
{rfe -> (1/11)*(-7 + 30*Sqrt[3]), l -> (1/600)*(17 - 4*Sqrt[3])}
Alternatively,
Solve[{irms == voltage/impedance, Im[l] == 0, Im[rfe] == 0}, {rfe,
l}][[1]] // FullSimplify
{rfe -> (1/11)*(-7 + 30*Sqrt[3]), l -> (1/600)*(17 - 4*Sqrt[3])}
Bob Hanlon
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:46 AM, <howard.lovatt at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Bob,
>
> Your solution is much better than mine. I had no idea that Reduce could be used like you showed.
>
> Bizarre that Solve and Reduce behave so differently!
>
> Thanks again,
>
> -- Howard.
>
--
Bob Hanlon
Prev by Date:
**Re: Reading Single and Double reals in Little-endian and Big-endian**
Next by Date:
**Re: How best to implement a hash table in Mathematica**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Complex and Solve**
Next by thread:
**Re: Complex and Solve**
| |