[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Can the code of a function obtain the names of its arguments?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg124414] Re: Can the code of a function obtain the names of its arguments?
*From*: Michael Stern <nycstern at gmail.com>
*Date*: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:07:52 -0500 (EST)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
I asked a related question five years ago. You can find the discussion
at http://forums.wolfram.com/mathgroup/archive/2006/Aug/msg00111.html
and linked pages.
Personally, if I wanted do something like this today, I would probably
change the inputs of the function so that the user passes both the
variable and a string.
So, if
a=2;b=3;c=4.
then Max[{a,b,c}] == 4
but if we want the variable name, we can do something like this:
myMax[valueAndName_List]:=First[SortBy[valueAndName, First]][[2]]
myMax[{2," a"}, {3, "b"}, {4," c"}]
="c"
On 1/18/2012 5:59 AM, James Stein wrote:
> I fear the answer is no, because I suspect that once values are bound to
> the names, there might seem to be scant use in keeping the names around.
>
> But I have a little debugging routine in mind I'd like to implement, so I'm
> hoping the answer is yes. (And if yes, how?)
Prev by Date:
**Re: Can the code of a function obtain the names of its arguments?**
Next by Date:
**Re: log-like symbols?**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Can the code of a function obtain the names of its arguments?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Can the code of a function obtain the names of its arguments?**
| |