Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: modulo solving lacking domain?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg126881] Re: modulo solving lacking domain?
  • From: Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:41:44 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <201206120659.CAA25892@smc.vnet.net> <C49675CE-DFFB-4759-A1FC-F853D06D2456@mimuw.edu.pl> <4FD7DD77.6040101@eecs.berkeley.edu> <88093364-D782-410D-8920-E66714C94086@gmail.com> <4FD8A1D4.2030201@eecs.berkeley.edu> <1D1918EF-72C2-4292-8573-C8D8FCD77B15@gmail.com> <4FD8EBC9.9020903@eecs.berkeley.edu> <jrcb1t$dqj$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 6/14/2012 2:31 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
> Why should Wolfram care more about the first kind of users than the second?


My primary criterion is that computer algebra systems have as few 
surprises as possible to people who know applied mathematics,
numerical analysis, and computational science.

When Mathematica surprises me,
occasionally I mention it here to see how other people
react.








  • Prev by Date: Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object based programming
  • Next by Date: is Head[] part of the expression?
  • Previous by thread: Re: modulo solving lacking domain?
  • Next by thread: Re: modulo solving lacking domain?