Services & ResourcesWolfram ForumsMathGroup Archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: modulo solving lacking domain?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg126881] Re: modulo solving lacking domain?
• From: Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
• Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:41:44 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• References: <201206120659.CAA25892@smc.vnet.net> <C49675CE-DFFB-4759-A1FC-F853D06D2456@mimuw.edu.pl> <4FD7DD77.6040101@eecs.berkeley.edu> <88093364-D782-410D-8920-E66714C94086@gmail.com> <4FD8A1D4.2030201@eecs.berkeley.edu> <1D1918EF-72C2-4292-8573-C8D8FCD77B15@gmail.com> <4FD8EBC9.9020903@eecs.berkeley.edu> <jrcb1t$dqj$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 6/14/2012 2:31 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
> Why should Wolfram care more about the first kind of users than the second?


My primary criterion is that computer algebra systems have as few 
surprises as possible to people who know applied mathematics,
numerical analysis, and computational science.

When Mathematica surprises me,
occasionally I mention it here to see how other people
react.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: modulo solving lacking domain?
    • From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski@gmail.com>

• References:
  • modulo solving lacking domain?
    • From: Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu>