[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

More general idea re operators

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg125392] More general idea re operators
• From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
• Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 04:09:12 -0500 (EST)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com

The thread, "New functional operator" prompts me to make a more general 
request.

It would be great if the symbols without a built in meaning, such as 
RightVector, could be defined more completely, including their 
precedence, associativity, and type (prefix, postfix, on infix).

I realise that this might cause some problems because text is formed 
into boxes in circumstances in which the relevant operator syntax 
declarations might not be available, but one solutions (at least) would 
be if such changes were recorded as options in the FE.

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk