More general idea re operators
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg125392] More general idea re operators
- From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 04:09:12 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
The thread, "New functional operator" prompts me to make a more general request. It would be great if the symbols without a built in meaning, such as RightVector, could be defined more completely, including their precedence, associativity, and type (prefix, postfix, on infix). I realise that this might cause some problems because text is formed into boxes in circumstances in which the relevant operator syntax declarations might not be available, but one solutions (at least) would be if such changes were recorded as options in the FE. David Bailey http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk