Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Engineering requests

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg125396] Re: Engineering requests
  • From: "McHale, Paul" <Paul.McHale at excelitas.com>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 04:06:06 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <201203061057.FAA18641@smc.vnet.net>

Dana,

The interval function looks a little to foreign to this intended purpose.  Slight changes in the representation you chose seems to break it quickly.

> Don't know if the following helps...
>
> Needs["Units`"]
> v = 3 Volt;
> r = 3 Ohm;

That is an interesting approach.  Thanks for the idea.

Paul

Paul McHale  |  Electrical Engineer, Energetics Systems  |  Excelitas Technologies Corp.

Phone:   +1 937.865.3004   |   Fax:  +1 937.865.5170   |   Mobile:   +1 937.371.2828
1100 Vanguard Blvd, Miamisburg, Ohio 45342-0312 USA
Paul.McHale at Excelitas.com
www.excelitas.com



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This email message and any attachments are confidential and proprietary to Excelitas Technologies Corp. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please inform the sender by replying to this email or sending a message to the sender and destroy the message and any attachments.
Thank you

Don't know if the following helps...

Needs["Units`"]
v = 3 Volt;
r = 3 Ohm;

Convert[r (v/r)^2, Watt]
3 Watt


As a side note, there were discussions back before Math 7 that the interval function was going to be updated to work with these dependence issues.
However, it appears not to have happened yet as of ver 8.
I think it's a complex task.

= = = = = = = = = = =
HTH  : >)
Dana DeLouis
Mac & Math 8
= = = = = = = = = = =




On Mar 5, 2:43 am, "McHale, Paul" <Paul.McH... at excelitas.com> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the ideas.  The minimalUnits[] is interesting.  It would be very interesting to assign variables values with units.  Likely, another data type would be required to support this.
> R1= 5 Ohm;
>
> I tried to use interval.  Maybe I'm not doing it right...
>
> R1int={100000-100000*(0.1),100000+100000(0.1)}
> R2int={30000-30000*(0.1),30000+30000(0.1)}
>
> (* Using interval (wrong answers) *)
> R1=Interval[R1int];
> R2=Interval[R2int];
> Vout=5/(R1+R2) R2 // Max
> Vout=5/(R1+R2) R2 // Min
>
> Out[1]= 1.41026
> Out[2]= 0.944056
>
> (* using table   (correct answers)    *)
> R1=R1int;
> R2=R2int;
> Table[5/(Ra+Rb) Rb,{Ra,R1},{Rb,R2}]// Max
> Table[5/(Ra+Rb) Rb,{Ra,R1},{Rb,R2}]// Min
>
> Out[3]= 1.34146
> Out[4]= 0.985401
>
> Table[] is actually getting me by.  The dimensional analysis would be very interesting, but again, we (I) get by without it.  The other engineers use dimensional analysis available in the other software.  It should be noted, it is quite limited in the other software.  Direct evaluation of relatively simple algebraic formula is supported, but it is clearly not supported by many functions.
>
> I have a mListFFT[] I've written.  I will post it in another thread for comments.  It is limited.  But works well enough for simple viewing of spectral content.
>
> Paul
>
> Paul McHale  |  Electrical Engineer, Energetics Systems  |  Excelitas Technologies Corp.
>
> Phone:   +1 937.865.3004   |   Fax:  +1 937.865.5170   |   Mobile:   +1 937.371.2828
> 1100 Vanguard Blvd, Miamisburg, Ohio 45342-0312 USA
> Paul.McH... at Excelitas.comwww.excelitas.com
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
> This email message and any attachments are confidential and proprietary to Excelitas Technologies Corp. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please inform the sender by replying to this email or sending a message to the sender and destroy the message and any attachments.
> Thank you
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: d... at wolfram.com [mailto:d... at wolfram.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Engineering requests
>
> On Friday, March 2, 2012 6:49:55 AM UTC-6, McHale, Paul wrote:
> > So, here are some problems we face, but don't have great answers for in Mathematica.
>
> > 1. Dimensional analysis.  To do this, we must have unit support. 
> > The best description of this is the ability to calculate (V/R)^2 R
> > and have it return a unit of watts.  Other programs handily support
> > this (though they are sorely lacking in other places :))
>
> Probably not exactly what you want, but you might have a look here.
>
> http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/Conferences/7513/
>
> In[40]:= minimalUnits[(v/o)^2*o]
> Out[40]= {Watts}
>
> > 2. Tolerances support.  One difficulty we have is determining the min/max at a certain point in a circuit even if the circuit is not complicated to model.  I use lists {Rmax,Rmin} and Table.  Works, but is a little clumsy.
> > [...]
>
> Have you tried using Interval[...] to specify value ranges? For basic arithmetic this should offer some possibilities. If you are computing, say, so lutions to differential equations with toleranced input values, that will be more of a challenge. In effect what one wants is some sensitivity analysis.  Can be done (using NDSolve), but is not so simple. That is to say, I do not recall the details of the setup.
>
> Daniel Lichtblau
> Wolfram Research






  • Prev by Date: Re: simple FFT function for review
  • Next by Date: Re: Engineering requests
  • Previous by thread: Re: Engineering requests
  • Next by thread: Re: Engineering requests