[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Integers that are the sum of 2 nonzero squares in exactly 2 ways
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg125748] Re: Integers that are the sum of 2 nonzero squares in exactly 2 ways
*From*: danl at wolfram.com
*Date*: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 03:43:19 -0500 (EST)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
*References*: <jkungd$asj$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:00:45 AM UTC-5, Cisco Lane wrote:
> I've been looking at integers that are the sum of 2 nonzero squares in exactly 2 ways. The smallest example is 50 = 5^2+5^2=7^2+1^2. The first few terms are 50, 65, 85, 125, 130, 145, .... This is given in OEIS as https://oeis.org/A025285
>
> If I plot the pairs {1,50},{2,65},{3,85},... I get a more or less straight line with a slope of about 8.85... In other words, eventually, about one in 8.85 integers qualify.
>
> I wonder if there is a theoretical value for this approximate number of 8.85...?
I don't know if this answers anything, but the factorization pattern of such numbers appears to be as follows. All primes of the form 4n+3 occur to even powers. There are one, two or three other factors. They can take the form
2^n*p*q where p and q are distinct primes of the form 4n+1, n an arbitrary nonnegative integer
2^(2*n+1)*p^2 with n, p as above
2^(2*n)*p^(2*k) for n as above and k satisfying some relation I cannot quite figure out other than it has to be at least 2. There may also be further restrictions on n that depend on k.
Daniel Lichtblau
Wolfram Research
Prev by Date:
**How do I stop Mathematica changing the format of fractions in Input cells?**
Next by Date:
**Fwd: new functional operator... paM is Map spelled backwards**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Integers that are the sum of 2 nonzero squares in exactly 2 ways**
Next by thread:
**Using Table and ignoring all errors and warnings?**
| |