|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128640] Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- From: Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 03:07:08 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <k7p3j3$ca3$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 11/11/2012 12:59 PM, bertiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii at gmail.com wrote:
> 1. Comparision of any Interval[___] to the empty interval Interval[]:
>
What makes you think that this is a notation for an empty Interval,
whatever that is?
Prev by Date:
Astronomical Data, property "position"
Next by Date:
Re: Export a graphical plot to pdf file
Previous by thread:
Relational operators on intervals: bug?
Next by thread:
Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
|